What is Making Stridz Athlete Development?

Making Stridz Athlete Development is the newest sport science company in Edmonton, Alberta. Making Stridz is dedicated to improving the growth and development of athletes of all ages and skill levels. Through the use of Dartfish Video Analysis Software athletes are able to use visual feedback as a method of improving their technique. Making Stridz also does game play analysis for a variety of sports allowing coaches to see an entire game broken down into smaller components.

download.pngClick here to download Dartviewer. This will allow you to access the Dartfish project which has been produced for you by Making Stridz Athlete Development.

download.pngClick here to view a sample project created by Making Stridz Athlete Development for the Hockey Canada Skills Academy Conference


//

News

May 15, 2012

With the off season training program starting up for most of the players, I thought I would provide everyone with some reading material and information regarding the transferability of off ice sprint work to on ice skating. When breaking down the first two steps of an elite level sprinter and comparing this to an elite level hockey player, you will notice that there are a lot of similarities between the two skills. Check out the video below to see a side by side comparison of the two skills.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bt2IK8j5SM0&feature=youtu.be

This comparison suggests that there is a high degree of transferability between the two skills. When looking at the 1st two steps of a hockey skating stride, the key variable which remains the same as sprinting is that the athlete is pushing off on a fixed point of contact (or there is very little to no glide present). As a result of this fixed point of contact, the athlete will want to emphasize a "sprinter like" mentality of driving off in the backwards direction and pushing directly into the ice. If you watch the video closely, you will notice that both athletes have a high degree of knee flexion in their support leg with the knee well out in front of the toe. This allows for the athlete to position their center of gravity directly over top of their support skate and therefore allow for a quicker stride rate (this is where the term "quick feet" initially came from). Both athletes will emphasize a strong arm drive and complete hip and knee extension (or triple extension) during the push off. This is important as it helps to produce more power during the force producing phase of the skill. The emphasis should be on the pushing leg driving into the ice, rather than the recovery leg being placed in front of the body. If the athlete tries to over reach (or overstride) then they will begin to experience a delay in their upcoming push off and therefore a slower rate of acceleration.

After the initial two steps, the hockey player will no longer have a fixed point of contact but rather a glide which will require a more lateral push off and therefore a transition in their skating stride. As the push off becomes more lateral, you should notice a slight change in the athletes arm swing as it will modify slightly in order to counterbalance the motion occurring at the lower body. This change will primarily result in the arms coming slightly across the front of the body in order to increase the ground reaction forces being applied to the ice. As the athlete continues to accelerate and gets closer to full velocity, the push off should become wider and as a result so will the arm swing. Note that there is a transitional phase where the athlete builds up the length of the skating stride as well as the width with each successive push off.

I have attached a couple of articles discussing the correlation of sprint work and other off ice testing to on ice skating.

http://www.nsca-lift.org/Perform/articles/04056.pdf

http://www.hockeytraining.eu/wp-content/uploads/Relationships-to-skating...

Thanks,

Brian Shackel, MSc

April 16, 2012

The final principle is unique in nature as it only applies to objects which are airborne or on surfaces which have extremely low coefficients of friction. An excellent example of this principle is figure skaters. Have you ever watched a figure skating competition and wondered how the athletes are able to complete a stationary spin on ice while increasing and decreasing their rate of spin. This motion is made possible due principle #7 and the conservation of angular momentum.

Angular momentum is the product of inertia (a body’s resistance to changes in motion) and that body’s angular velocity. As a result, in order to maintain a constant angular momentum, the figure skater can manipulate their body in order to increase its inertia, while subsequently decreasing its angular velocity or visca versa. In the figure skating example, the figure skaters will utilize their arms in order to decrease their inertia (bring the arms closer to their body) which in turn causes them to increase their rate of spin or angular velocity. As they near the end of the spin, they will move their arms further away from their body (increasing their inertia) which in turn will cause a decrease in their angular velocity and slow down their rate of spin.

This principle also plays a vital role in the success of elite level divers. When the diver moves from a layout position to a tuck position, they are ultimately manipulating their moment of inertia in order to adjust their angular velocity. If the divers timing is off, they will not make a clean entrance into the pool. This is part of the reason why you will see divers break form (ie. flex the knees) near the completion of their jump in order to increase their velocity in hopes of making a cleaner entrance into the pool. Elite level divers are extremely gifted in knowing where they should be when coming out of a dive in order to make a clean entrance into the water. This is where repetition and quality feedback from the coach and/or Biomechanist can help to improve the diver’s performance and overall score on a dive.

Brian Shackel, MSc

April 12, 2012

Making Stridz Athlete development will be presenting a free seminar called "Science of Running: Technique + Prehab =Performance" at the Leduc Health and Wellness Fair on April 12th, 2012 at 7:30 pm in the Venger Room at the Leduc Recreation Center!

If you’re just starting out running or have many running miles behind you, this workshop will help improve your performance. We will disucss a wide variety of topics including the much debated topic of "heel striking vs. forefoot running" as well as provide some strength and soft tissue exercises to improve your running performance!

http://www.leducleisure.com/2012_LRC_health-wellness_poster.pdf

Thanks,
Brian Shackel, MSc

April 11, 2012

When looking at the principle of angular motion, it is important to have a solid understanding of several other biomechanics terms.
• Angular Velocity = change in angular position (or displacement) / change in time
• Torque = Force X Distance (perpendicular)

In order to generate angular motion, a force must be applied onto an object acting a certain distance away from the object. As a result, in order to increase the torque, an athlete can either increase the force which they are applying to an object or apply this force further away from their axis of rotation.

A classic example of angular motion is the throwing arm of a baseball pitcher. Professional baseball players are able to generate extremely high angular velocities in their throwing shoulder (specifically internal rotation of the pitching arm) which increases the linear velocity of the ball coming out of the hand. If you consider the baseball pitcher as an example and use the pitchers spine as their axis of rotation and the perpendicular distance from the ball to the axis of rotation as their distance, you will be able to determine ways to increase the linear velocity of the ball at release. A pitcher can produce a larger torque by applying a larger force or by moving this ball further away from the axis of rotation. Unfortunately, this example is not a simple as we just described it, but it does give you a valuable reference point. For a pitcher to truly increase the velocity of the ball at release, they need to factor in nearly every biomechanical principle we have talked about to date. Specifically, the pitcher needs to emphasize the principles which help to produce maximum effort or force (principles #2 and #3) as well as the principles which apply to linear motion (principles #4 and #5). Throwing a baseball requires full body mechanics and factors in linear and angular movements as well as the importance of proper sequencing of these movements.

Thanks,
Brian Shackel, MSc

April 2, 2012

This principle seems relatively straight forward upon first glance, but there are some key features to focus on when applying this principle to your sport. Liner motion is motion along a line that may be straight or curved, with all parts of the body moving in the same direction at the same speed.

Running is most likely the best example of Principle #5 as it is true linear motion. When an athlete is running, the primary direction of force application is down into the ground and in the backwards direction. If you look at the runner who is “bouncy” they most often are applying too much force down into the ground which results in them becoming more of a vertical projectile, however, if you look at the runner who has no vertical deviation of their center of gravity, they are applying force primary in the backwards direction. This relationship also holds true when looking at long jumpers vs. high jumpers. A long jumper will apply more of their force backwards, causing them to be more of a horizontal projectile, while a high jumper will apply more of their force down into the ground in order to become a vertical projectile.

An interesting example of this principle which might fall under the area of “movement usually” occurs in the direction opposite to that of the applied force is skating in hockey. If you look at the below image you will gain a greater understanding of an example where the direction of force application might not cause motion in the opposite direction.

Skating Ice Pattern.jpg

When you watch a highly skilled hockey player skate down the ice going from a stationary position into maximum velocity, it is fair to say that the player will skate in almost a perfect straight line. With that being said, based on Principle #5, the direction of force application should occur 90 degrees to the direction of travel (or the push off skate should move directly behind the athlete into true hip extension). However, if you look at the tracings on the ice in the image above you will see that the force application angle moves from 90 degrees to the direction of travel to 45 degrees to the direction of travel. This change in push off angle does not cause a change in the direction which the hockey player is heading. Furthermore, when you factor in Newton’s 3rd Law of Motion that for “every action there is an equal and opposite reaction” you can begin to discuss the use of the arms in the skating stride. I think most people would agree that a runners direction of force application is directly backwards (in the sagittal plane) and as a result, the runners arms should move primarily in the forwards/backwards direction in order to improve the rhythm of the runner and increase the force which can be applied to the ground. When you bring this same concept to a hockey player, you will notice that the direction of force application is 45 degrees to the direction of travel. What does this mean for the arm swing? Should the arms move opposite to the direction of travel or opposite to the direction of force application? I am of the belief that the arm swing should move forwards and across the front of the athletes body as the push off skate is moved backwards and away from the athlete’s midline. For more information on this debate, review the article written by Dr. Marion Alexander from the University of Manitoba:

http://www.coachesinfo.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=...)

and the video by Dr. Michael Bracko from The Hockey Institute:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=TrAAoE039Vk).

Definitely food for thought for those hockey players, parents and coaches! Feel free to pass your comments onto me regarding this debate…..

Thanks,
Brian Shackel, MSc

March 26, 2012

What is impulse (I)?

Impulse is the product of force (F) and the time (t) over which the force acts (I=Ft). With that being said, when a force is applied to an object, the resulting motion of the body is dependent not only on the magnitude of the force but also on the duration of the force application. Therefore, an object can be set in motion by applying a large force over a relatively short period of time or a small force over a relatively long period of time. Both of these impulses can create motion in an object, but what is more effective at producing motion in sports.

One of the most common examples of impulse in sports is the volleyball player who jumps up to spike a ball during a match. Theoretically, the volleyball player has two options. Option number one, the volleyball player could apply a relatively small force over a longer time frame to produce an impulse. Option number two, the same volleyball player could apply a large force over a relatively short period of time to produce the exact same impulse. However, in theory this makes sense, but when it is put into practice, the volleyball player who choses option two will generate more vertical velocity and has a much higher jump height. In sports or activities which require more “explosive movements” a large force applied over a short time frame will produce a much better result. Another example of this is a hockey player attempting to take slap shot. The hockey player can produce a much harder shot if the force is applied to the puck over a very short period of time (ie. the less time the puck is on the stick, the harder the shot).

With that being said, there are several examples in sports where it is important to produce less impulse. For example, a hockey player receiving a pass or baseball player receiving a ground ball will want to allow the time of force application to be increased in order to decrease the force with which the object is received. This is done by cushioning the pass or grounder. A hockey player is taught to have soft hands and allow the puck to hit the stick and absorb the puck. This motion allows the force to be absorbed over a longer period of time, thus decreasing the overall impulse. Have you ever heard you coach say that receiving a pass should be “quiet”? In the baseball example, the fielder will absorb the force of the ball by bringing the hands into the body and transitioning it into a throw. The longer time spend absorbing the force, the less the impulse which will be applied to the glove and hand. This principle can help ease the pain of the baseball player who catches the ball in the palm of the glove without allowing time to absorb the ball.

Check back next week for more in Linear Motion and Principle #5!

Thanks,
Brian Shackel, MSc

March 22, 2012

In case you missed "The Nature of Things: The Perfect Runner". Click on the link below:

http://www.cbc.ca/natureofthings/episode/the-perfect-runner.html

Thanks,
Brian Shackel, MSc

March 19, 2012

The production of maximum velocity requires the use of joints in order – from the largest to the smallest. Now that you have a greater understanding of using all of the joints possible to produce maximum force, it is important to gain a greater understanding of the sequential timing of these movements.

A classic example of using your joints from largest to smallest is found in almost all rotational skills (ie. throwing a shot, hitting and throwing a baseball, hitting a golf ball, etc). During these sports skills, it is important to utilize “segmental rotation” where the rotational velocity of one joint is transferred into the next joint. For example, if you look at a golf professional hitting a ball, you will notice a very distinct sequence of events……

1. During the takeaway, the golfer will turn the shoulders back prior to turning the hips back which will create “shoulder hip separation” at the top of the backswing as well as allow the golfers weight to be transferred to the back foot.
2. The downswing will be initiated with the hips rotating counter clockwise (for a right handed golfer) while the shoulders “lag” behind and start their movement slightly after the hips. This allows the hips (the larger joint) to move prior to the shoulders (the smaller joint) and start the process of segmental rotation.
3. The shoulders will then begin the downswing in a counter clockwise direction while the hand elbow and hand “lag” behind. The elbow and hand will begin to move in the counter clockwise direction leaving the head of the golf club behind.
4. Finally the club head will begin the downswing and continue to accelerate through impact.

By going through this distinctive series of events, the angular velocity of the hip rotation (the initial movement) is able to be transferred into the shoulders, the shoulders into the elbow, elbow into the wrist and wrist into the club head. This allows the club head to be travelling at its maximum velocity leading up to ball contact. If one of these motions is done out of order (ie. the shoulder and hips rotate together) there is a significant loss in club head velocity and thus ball speed and overall length of the shot. This series of events allows players with a shorter, more compact swing to hit the ball as far as or further than someone with a longer swing, because they are going through the proper sequencing to generate peak club head velocity at impact.

A similar thought process can also be applied to a soccer player striking a soccer ball. If a soccer player performs the proper sequence, with the kicking hip moving forwards and leaving the knee behind, followed by the knee coming forwards and the foot “lagging” behind and finally the foot coming through at contact they will be able to increase their ball speed. If everything moves towards the ball at the same time, then there is a significant loss of power in the shot. This relationship holds true due to the summation of the joints!!!

Thanks and check back next week for Principle #4: The greater the applied impulse, the greater the increase in velocity.

Thanks,
Brian Shackel, MSc

March 12, 2012

The production of maximum force requires the use of all joints that can be used. When an athlete is attempting to produce maximum force in a sports skill, they are most often trying to throw (ie. a baseball pitcher) or move an object (ie. hitting a golf ball) in order to impart maximum velocity in the object.

There are a couple of different ways to put this principle into practice, but the easiest way to understand the meaning behind the principle is to take a sports skill and eliminate the principle from the skill. For example, if you look at the developmental progressions of an athlete throwing a ball from the very early stages (childhood) to the late stages (adulthood) you will notice how this athlete progresses in terms of their throwing mechanics. When a child first begins to throw a ball (see the video below) you will notice that the child throws the ball from above their head with very little motion coming from the remainder of their body.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2DUC6pzPC-I

This is a very primitive movement pattern, but if you take the same child and teach them to start with the ball further back, turn their shoulders to the side and take a step you will notice a significant increase in their ability to throw the ball (see video below).

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tJStf7YjvbI

As this movement pattern becomes more refined, the athlete will learn to incorporate as many joints as possible in order to generate maximum effort. This will also tie into Principle #3 which will be posted next week. Check out the video below of a 10 year old throwing a baseball. Note the high leg kick, long step and the use of the entire body in the throw.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qh_Sxvfk2J8

Finally, take a look at a this video of Giants pitcher Tim Lincecum as he go throw the same motions as the 10 year old in the previous video but increases the range or motion for the movements, has improved timing and generates more ball velocity by utilizing every joint in his body.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fTi6fQ22sH0

The principle of maximum effort can be applied to a wide variety of sports skills and with spring just around the corner we will make reference to the golf swing for a second sports specific example. As a beginning golfer or high handicapper, one of the comments which you might hear from some of your more experienced golfing friends is that “you are not transferring your weight when you hit the ball” or perhaps that “you are only swinging with your arms”. These two comments come directly back to the principle of maximum effort. If you are not transferring your weight from the back leg to the front leg or if you are swinging with just your arms, you almost completely eliminate the lower half of your body from the golf swing. This will have a significant effect on the amount of club head speed you can generate and therefore the distance you can hit the ball. One final golf example to look at is when you are putting the golf ball. With the putter in your hand, very rarely are you attempting to produce maximum effort (unless of course your name is John Daly - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hwzTGHN7tVI). As a result of this, you are no longer looking to “use as many joints that can be used to produce maximum effort” but rather looking to develop a controlled movement pattern which is easy to reproduce and control. As a result, the putting stroke is taught as a pendulum from the shoulders and all other joints are left out of the stroke. In putting, the more moving parts you have the harder it is to reproduce the stroke and gain the desired consistency.

Check back next week for more information on Principle #3…

Thanks,
Brian Shackel, MSc

March 9, 2012

Click on the link below to view the article (pgs. 16-17) written by Making Stridz Athlete Development in the spring edition of Hockey Calgary Magazine.

http://www.hockeymagazine.net/calgary.html

Thanks,
Brian Shackel, MSc


More...

featured_athlete_title.png

Austin Steger

Austin Steger

Current Team: SSAC United Cycle Bulldogs - AMMHL

Season Highlights: Austin has 6 points (2G and 4 A) in 27 games this season in his first season in AAA Midget Minor

Career Highlights: Although born in Montreal, Austin played the first 10 season of his hockey career in Florida. He strived to perform to the best of his ability with a lot of his skills and knowledge coming from playing on the AAA Tampa Bay Lightning '96's. Austin was on the winning team for the Bell Canada Cup in the PeeWee Division! After moving back to Montreal, Quebec, he played for the Harrington College Icebergs for 2 years in the Ligue Hockey Developement du Montreal Metropolitain. Austin has successfully transitioned to AAA hockey in Alberta this past season and is currently a student at Louis St. Laurent where he is continuing to learn from their excellent hockey academy staff!





testimonials.png

"It was the see and feel of the corrective exercises in conjunction with the skating video that made such a difference. I appreciate all your help Brian, and again, he couldn't have done it without you."
Jerry - Parent

"I feel so much stronger and more stable on my skates. Such a huge change in my skating stride from where I was at this time last season."
Marc - WHL Hockey Player

"Being able to see exactly how the athlete is moving is extremely beneficial in the development of a treatment plan for my patients."
Dr. Tyler - Chiropractor

"Brian Shackel, and Making Stridz Athlete Development, has been a tremendous resource for me. As a long-distance runner and cyclist, as well as avid strength and conditioning guy, I had some nagging form-related issues and muscle imbalances that that were beginning to threaten my ability to stay as active as I would like. I connected with Making Stridz because I want to perform at my best and avoid getting injured, and I want to do both of those things for a very long time. The Functional Movement Screen and Brian's insightful feedback have made an immediate difference in my movement form, and I can already see how my work with Brian will continue to improve my efficiency and injury-proofedness. All that, and he's a really nice guy to boot! Thanks, Brian."
Dan - Runner/Cyclist